Latest Nature Index supplement provides unique insight into extent of international collaboration on high-quality research
11 November 2015
The Nature Index 2015 Collaborations report, published as a supplement to Nature on 12 November, provides more evidence of the emergence of a 'Fourth Age' of scientific discovery where high-impact research is conducted through international
collaboration and demonstrates the benefits of participation in international networks for emergent research nations.
The Nature Index (www.natureindex.com) database tracks the author affiliations of nearly 60,000 high quality scientific
articles published per year from over 20,000 research institutions worldwide. The database has been compiled by Springer
Nature in collaboration with Digital Science, a technology company serving the needs of the science and research
communities.
The Collaborations report is the first of a new style of Nature Index supplement that further probes the data to answer questions about the role of collaboration in global science. The report brings data collected from the Index to life through in-depth editorials, interviews with leading academics from around the world and a series of stunning infographics, produced by data visualisation experts Small Multiples and Digital Science.
Nick Campbell, Executive Editor, Nature said: "With the Nature Index Collaborations, we expect to bring a brand new
perspective to help understand the relationships between institutions and countries in global science, and in particular what
drives high-quality, high-impact collaborations."
Some highlights from this supplement:
- More than half of articles from UK institutions have a co-author from a second country.
- Only about one third of articles from the US have a co-author from a second country.
- Australia is moving from collaborating most often with European nations, particularly the UK, to expanding collaborations in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly China.
- Spain and Portugal stand out in the European cluster for their links to Latin America, a new regional network with its own structure led by Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Argentina.
- While the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is the leading institution in the world in terms of WFC*, Peking and Tsinghua Universities are more internationally collaborative than CAS, based on the proportion of international affiliations appearing on articles their researchers contribute to.
- Seventy percent of Africa’s FC derives from collaborations with non-African countries. Collaborations within the continent are rare, although initiatives are in place to create more.
- Arabic-speaking countries, including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, have stronger links to each other than they do with South Africa (see 'African network').
- The data reveal a trend towards more collaborations between France and countries that are her former colonies, particularly with France’s leading institution, the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). Industry makes a notable contribution to high-quality academic research: in 2014 commercial entities represented nearly a quarter of institutions in the index and contributed to nearly 7% of articles.
The supplement also shows the role that international collaborations have played in China’s continuing rise in scientific publishing, assesses whether location still plays an important role in industry–academia collaborations and questions whether
government policies are the best way to encourage international interdisciplinary collaborations.
More information about the Nature Index is available at: www.natureindex.com
The Nature Index 2015 Collaborations supplement is available here: www.nature.com/nature-index-collaborations.
Data visualisations from the supplement are available on request.
